Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Scott


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Madison Scott

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for pornographic actors or the general notability guideline. (Prod contested, speedy declined.) – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 20:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see any evidence that this individual meets WP:PORNBIO and nothing to indicate that she meets WP:GNG; there is a single article in a local newspaper.  And I strongly doubt she made a million in four years, not that that affects an AfD process.  Ubelowme (talk) 21:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

• Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 02:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with the above assement with one caveat. As pointed out source mentioned is not creadible - looking it over it is WP:Primary Source since it is based on an interview with the subject of the article who has a vested interest in this story. The second source - is AFD. Bio and Film date sourced from that database is used in violation of its terms of service. Further more the conclusion that the subject appeared in 88 is Both WP:Synth - and out dated. These are all indicators that this BLP would be best deleted - fixing it would require rewriting it from scratch. BO &#124; Talk 13:19, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.