Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madness: Their Nightmare, My Reality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 09:44, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Madness: Their Nightmare, My Reality

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG, there does not appear to be any mention of the book outside of ecommerce sites, self-published, and the editor that both created the page and has contributed the most to it has not responded to a conflict of interest tag on their talk page. Rosguill talk 03:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Strong delete, noting that this was a AfC submission declined twice in March and once in August. The notability and promotionality concerns of the AfC reviewers were not at all addressed (in fact, the article was not substantially changed since shortly before the first review) and was moved to mainspace without satisfying inclusion criteria. I've found no coverage besides listings where the book is sold, on Amazon, etc. Pretty much blatant self-promotion, and unlikely to be improved. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 05:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * (1) CSD G13 does not apply to this page. CSD G13 only applies to abandoned drafts or submissions in the draft space or user space. It does not apply to any page in the mainspace, or any page that has not been abandoned. (2) There is no promotion in this article, which appears to be neutrally written. James500 (talk) 10:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , I am aware that G13 does not apply. I think it's almost certain that this will fall under WP:SNOW though. If people don't agree, obviously I'd be wrong, but unfortunately, I feel the articles fate will be exactly the same as the poor snowball. I guess using that as the first response to the AfD is a bit crystal-y though :/ Probably should have just called it strong delete instead. — Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. I wish the author well, but there's just nothing out there to show that this book is notable enough to pass WP:NBOOK. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡)  21:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources in the article are clearly not enough to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, and I haven't been able to find any coverage in reliable sources. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 23:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I am unable to find this book in WorldCat. James500 (talk) 00:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Book does not pass WP:NBOOK.Auldhouse (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above - fails WP:NBOOK. Jmertel23 (talk) 16:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - The username of the article author is the same as the initials of the book's author, and the account is a WP:SPA; leads me to believe the article is WP:PROMOTION. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.