Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madoka Mako


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per unanimous responses. (non-admin closure) Skomorokh  01:12, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Madoka Mako

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I see no assertion that complies with WP:BIO. αѕєηιηє t/c 17:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 19:35, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The article definitively asserts notability: "was known as the most prominent Christian mangaka in Japan," and even has a source for that statement. The fact that the subject is covered at all in English strongly suggests further sources can be found in Japanese. Keep, tag for notability and needing additional sorces, and remand to the Japan and Manga wikiprojects. If additional sources aren't found in a more reasonable timeframe than 2 minutes after creation, THEN we can revisit the issue. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Bad fatih nomination - this article was AfD'ed TWO MINUTES after the article was created. This sort of bullshit was why I left wikipedia the first time in the first place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.95.231 (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Anon is correct that it was AfDed two minutes after creation. It needs time to be edited. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 21:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep give it a chance Dreamspy (talk) 22:03, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I found +830 hits in Google (Japanese). Where's the not notability? Zero Kitsune (talk) 00:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Notability is defined by coverage in independent secondary sources, not GHits consisting of booksellers and blogs. I am very mildly amenable to a "speedy keep", but on the grounds of WP:BITE, not poor keep arguments like this. cab (talk) 00:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment A Japanese search on the pen name does confirm the existence of the comics claimed in the source, e.g. Manga History of Christianity in Japan . However, it does not show any evidence of reliable, independent sources, just booksellers and blogs. Same for searching on the titles of what appear to be her better-known works: ; . cab (talk) 00:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article asserts notability and has several sources. Edward321 (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The article has one source, a website set up by some company, claiming itself to be authoritative ("the WWW's original and most complete site"). cab (talk) 05:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.