Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madonna: Innocence Lost


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Three strong arguments for keep on policy grounds. There is only a few hours left until the deadline and there appears no chance the consensus will change in that time, and the submissions are unanimous with no active discussion ongoing. If anyone disagrees with my closure, let me know on my talk page and I will undo the close and leave for an administrator. (non-admin closure) MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Madonna: Innocence Lost

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not seem WP:NOTABLE per WP:FILM, and not enough WP:RS in third party. — IB [ Poke ] 10:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — IB  [ Poke ] 10:49, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:NFILM requires at least 2 notable reviews. There are reviews from Variety and NY Times cited in the article. Donald D23   talk to me  12:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Donaldd23. As far as I remember, there exists other third party sources. It can be expanded with them. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as has three reliable sources reviews in the article: Variety, New York Times and People Magazine so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:52, 17 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.