Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madre Grande Monastery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Madre Grande Monastery

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The Madre Grande Monastery is closed, and with this article being extremely short, borderlining on being a stub, I would assume it is not likely to be open to expansion any time soon, since no further data on the place is going to be available. For this reason, I submit for deletion, in that the likelihood of making a working article from this is going to be practically nil. Cat in the Hat &#124; To the Thinga-ma-jigger &#124; Whistle for Things 1 and 2 00:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Although an institution that is now closed might be notable (notability is not temporary), Wikipedia doesn't even have an article about the order with which this monastery was associated. Since we don't have an article about the more general topic, I don't see a need for an article about this more specific topic. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 00:54, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 04:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 04:22, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. No indication of notability on searching, and the monastery doesn't seem to have a long history. -- 202.124.74.2 (talk) 11:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The example given for its "regular" events was only celebrated at all from 2003 to 2006. – Fayenatic  L ondon 12:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.