Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaestroZone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW. – Juliancolton  | Talk 00:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

MaestroZone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible hoax, a website article which does not state its site address. A google search seems to indicate that the site has not yet gone live. If it is a real site then wait for it to go live and then get 3rd party coverage. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * In addition the primary editor appears to be the primary developer of the site so COI comes in to play. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced and COI here. But I'm confused as to how this is a hoax; I found the site without any problem: http://maestrozone.marksmusiconline.co.uk/ Now finding notability, I could not. - Warthog Demon  16:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The site "MaestroZone.com" does not exist, and this seems to be a test page at the editor's own website. Although I'm not asking for deletion on those grounds, it fails WP:N easily. Darrenhusted (talk)
 * I am confused, but no doubt it's just me being slow here. At any rate, I wasn't thinking you were AFDing this on that, so no problem. :P - Warthog Demon  17:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

this is information about a social network site for musicians that has just started. The Chicago Symphony Orchestra use and have told me that they will link to it when they update there website, this will be soon. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markharding93 (talk • contribs)
 * But that does not make it notable, not after one month. Where do you rank on Alexa? Darrenhusted (talk) 17:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * We have only just released so, like when facebook first started, are not a very high rank. Soon we will be releasing www.maestrozone.com but untill then we are ok with our subdomain. Please remove the delete request. User:markharding93 (talk) 17:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Can't do that Mark. You're right, when Facebook started it ranked no where, it also didn't have a Wikipedia article. However once it was one of the hundred most used sites then it did. Unless you can jump a few million places in three days I don't see your article staying. Darrenhusted (talk) 22:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 17:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There is nothing wrong with this site and it is not a hoax! The Chicago Symphony Orchestra do use and have not yet put the link on their site. They will do this when they updgarde their site. User:markharding93 (talk) 17:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * But you can't source it at the moment, which is what matters - Kingpin13 (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I apologise, I mis-spoke when I said hoax, but on the article pages for MySpace and Facebook they list their sites, you did not list your homepage. This caused me to be suspicious. No matter, MySpace has 124,000,000 visitors last month (February) and Facebook had 276,000,000 visitors. I only noticed your page because you kept trying to spam the Facebook page. Once you've had 100,000,000 visits then you may have something. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, no primary sources, let alone secondary. And per above - Kingpin13 (talk) 17:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Please can you explain how i can improve it and use sources - primary and secondary. User:markharding93 (talk) 17:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well see WP:SOURCE, which should explain it. By primary and secondary I mean "internal" and "external" sources (i.e. if they are involved with the company or third party). Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per my earlier A7. &rarr; Dyl @  n  620  17:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * What is the reason for deleting this. User:markharding93 (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * By A7 he means it's not notable enough to merit a page on Wikipedia, please read the link he provided. - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete A7 Jenuk1985  |  Talk  17:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unable to locate sourcing, little to no third party coverage, A7. &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 18:01, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, but the author is welcome to add it back once there has been some media coverage indicating the importance of the site. Pburka (talk) 19:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Absolutely - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * delete - currently apparently no third party coverage as required by WP:V and WP:RS. Wikipedia is WP:NOT an advertising media to help launch the product.--  The Red Pen of Doom  02:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not meet our notability requirements; a Google News archive search turned up zero relevant hits. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 03:40, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.