Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mafia Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 07:13, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Mafia Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article that does not establish the subject's notability; no coverage in reliable third-party sources. Huon (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Retain as stub. Remove all the unsourced stuff. Appears to exist and might have coverage in the future. (I basically am a WP:Deletionist.BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Note.Could just be a matter of time before it gets noticed. See https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Mafia+Magazine%22. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I notice, the creator, has blanked it, and no one else has added any substantial content. Is this a G7?  ekips39 (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I reverted the blanking. IMO this magazine is probably notable given that it's been around for ten years. Let's let the AfD run its course to see if anyone can find RS. Pax 08:54, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article provides no evidence of notability, and I have been unable to find any. Ok, "might have coverage in the future" and "Could just be a matter of time before it gets noticed"; if it does become notable, then an article can be created. Maproom (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * May I ask, where are the citations/references for this article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_Is_%28Nitzer_Ebb_EP%29 and I am sure I can find several others in just minutes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Madegray (talk • contribs) 12:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * You're making a WP:OTHERSTUFF argument. Pax 22:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * But he's right, that is another strong candidate for deletion. Maproom (talk) 23:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * No; he's wrong, because that's not the point he was trying to make. The essence of WP:OTHERSTUFF argumentation is that non-notable material be retained because there are other inferior articles on the encyclopedia. While that may be true, the argument is invalid. Pax</b> 08:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 12:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.