Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdalena Wróbel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ultimately, the "keep" side provides no convincing, specific references to establish notability. Ambrosiawater writes that "we will just need to source the proper references to demonstrate it" - well, yes, and the time in which that should have been done is now over.  Sandstein  14:09, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Magdalena Wróbel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources out there to substantiate claims of notability. Other language wikis don't offer any either, some are even sourceless. Trillfendi (talk) 17:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:59, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:00, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep She was a notable model for a few years around the year 2000. Durindaljb (talk) 16:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Without sufficient proof of that, she doesn’t meet notability guidelines for inclusion (by any stretch of the imagination). Trillfendi (talk) 16:33, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Lots of magazine covers and Victoria's Secret photos can be found. Durindaljb (talk) 04:57, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Appearance does not equal notability without significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.... It’s not hard. There are hundreds of un-notable Victoria’s Secret models. Trillfendi (talk) 12:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: A little divisive...
 * Weak delete. Systemic bias aside, we cannot just say WP:ITSNOTABLE. We need proof that goes beyond just having a decent career. And I am not seeing much (the search is more complex as there is also an actress pl:Magdalena Wróbel (aktorka), and a business executive that doesn't have her own article yet). Weak delete unless someone can find sources/awards or such that will help with NBIO. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:11, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - being in a single runway show for a single brand does not make one notable, nor having a couple of supporting film roles. There's no evidence in that article, from reliable sources, that she's had any "editorial". A redirect to List of Victoria's Secret models would be a cheap way out. Bearian (talk) 18:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The content of the article appears demonstrates notability, but we will just need to source the proper references to demonstrate it. Google searches reveal no dearth of suitable references. Ambrosiawater (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラP 04:22, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment I haven't found a great deal - mostly just her name in histories of Wonderbra. She was one of the models in the very first Victoria's Secret show in 1995 (the most I've found about that so far is a para in Marie Claire ). The Spanish magazine Interviú featured her as "la nueva chica wonderbra" in issue 1297 (which I discovered from a listing on the Spanish equivalent of ebay, so I haven't seen it and don't know how long it is, whether it's just an interview, or indeed whether it can be considered a reliable source). I haven't yet searched for her with the other brands she has modelled for, which might bring up more sources. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.