Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magdy's Exchanger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Magdy's Exchanger

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD. Created by the person behind the concept. I can't find any sources and it appears to be pure original research. bonadea contributions talk 22:02, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:20, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article is original research that has not been published in any third-party reliable sources that are independent of the subject (such as textbooks on calculus).  It clearly does not satisfy the notability requirements for an encyclopedia article.  Moreover, the result being claimed is wrong.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 00:25, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. Pburka (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. Joel B. Lewis (talk) 14:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 16:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete for blatant reasons, unencyclopaedic, methods are covered in other articles, WP:OR, and a genuinely poor article... F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 23:55, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.