Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magento


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn, per this one link; on page three of Google News. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 16:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Magento

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I came across this article because the Sboeconnect (new page) editor said, why can Magento have an article and we can't? So I looked at this article... while it would appear to include inline citations, I do not see any sources that are non-trivial and third-party; things come from blogs or this company's website or from directory listings. Because of the lack of reliable sources that do not indicate importance, and the advertising tone of the article, I'm nominating this for AFD. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - the google news link above seems to indicate there is significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I get Magento's home page, Twitter links, software downloads, but I don't see any coverage in the ways of articles about the company, etc. As a software company, clearly there will be some links to get the software, but where are reviews of the software or indications that it is particularly important? &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:46, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You're clicking on the wrong link - click on 'news' above your nom. PhilKnight (talk) 15:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I see links of a couple mergers related to the company (Paypal), but nothing really about the company. Any smallish company will have news from time to time, but what about the company itself? If this nom is completely off-base, then I will retract it, but I really don't see coverage covering the company and/or explaining its notability. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 16:40, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.