Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic, Magic (2013 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Materialscientist (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Magic, Magic (2013 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails notability guideline for future films and general notability guideline. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete The knobhead creating this article has also been responsible for this hoax and this one. Delete, salt and block this user.  Lugnuts  (talk) 18:37, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * speedy delete per WP:NFF Gaijin42 (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Don't salt, though. This is a real film in development and will eventually meet the guidelines for WP:NFF by this time next year. (It obviously doesn't meet that guideline right now, though.) Unless it's been repetitively added, there's no need for salt at this time in my opinion.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I do recommend blocking the editor if/when he makes another addition or edit like this, though.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Delete --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 22:56, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Normally I'd argue for incubate, but this is too low profile. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:35, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't like the comments about blocking the original contributor. He looks like a valued member of the Wiki film community who just got a bit too enthusiastic on the upcoming films.  I'll leave a note on his talk page and suggest he cools it a bit on the speculative future stuff. --Legis (talk - contribs) 01:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If a talkpage full of deletion discussions, links to policies and warnings isn't enough, I don't know what is. Tough shit for this guy.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not so sure they were deliberate hoaxes, maybe just misguided. Looks like a new user who hasn't edited since the warnings...  --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I would agree they aren't hoax, just ignorance, or ignoring of policy. If he stays on the good path, he can stay, but I would say after so many warnings and notifications, he is definately on thin ice. If its ignoring, thats vandalism. If its ignorance, WP:COMPETENCE Gaijin42 (talk) 15:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm - I spoke too soon - I just had to remove The Expendables 3 (2015) from the Sylvester Stallone filmography. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.