Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Fish of Isloa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 01:39, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Magic Fish of Isloa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage of this particular aspect of the game Fish Tycoon to justify its own article. The Fish Tycoon article is not anywhere near too long. Recommend either deletion or redirect. Leaning towards the former, as I'm not really sure people looking for the game would search for it by this title. Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 05:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:55, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Merge/Redirect without redirect  The fish are already listed at Fish Tycoon? --Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In addition I don't think a redirect works because "Isola" was misspelled as Isloa. (Was fixed.) --Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Changed my vote to merge since more information was added. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The lack of sources could prove a problem though, so I don't resist a plain delete redirect either... --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete (or merge). These fish have no coverage or significance beyond the scope of Fish Tycoon; there is no need for a separate article. - Iago Qnsi (talk) 06:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect if needed as this specifically for the game with none of it seeming convincing for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  07:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.