Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Touch (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nitrome. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  14:02, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Magic Touch (game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to have sufficient independent coverage. A search only found a few websites hosting the web game, a Wikia source, and articles about an unrelated smartphone app. Article is unsourced. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 04:32, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, this article was plagiarized from Nitrome Wiki. Original article. NitromeNobody (talk) 23:14, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 10:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * It's fine if it's attributed since Wikia is cc-by-sa. Only an issue if the text was plagiarized to Wikia in the first place (but then cite that original location in the copyvio req) – czar   15:33, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Nitrome. If the subject is a valid search term, and it is, redirection to the dev article is always preferred to deletion. Redirection is more useful than deletion. Also after this closes, please rename to "(video game)" per naming conventions. – czar   15:34, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  13:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:28, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.