Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic in Fairy Tail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Magic in Fairy Tail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Trivia list of in-universe information without notability. DragonZero ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 08:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

*Delete. This article is sourced almost entirely to the show itself, apparently based on watching it. I should note that the main article for this manga is at Fairy Tail. If anyone finds any useful nuggets in this one, it can be merged to that article. İn ictu ocli (talk) 10:58, 6 October 2013 (UTC) inpersonation, banevation


 * Comment; other editors, and anyone closing this AfD, please be aware that this is not myself but a sock playing at building a history. It has been added to relevant SPI. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * [Keep by creator] - First of all, please pardon my English. I agree with you all. I tried to write it in non-universe form but there is some points that only suitable the Wikipedia's criteria. I just edit it but I know there is a lot to improve. I'm not good with "notability" you said just now. I agree for merging this article with the main but when I get the "greatest" references for this article, I want to claim it back online! Cheers! SNN95 (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTPLOT. Give me one source that gives this article notability. DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 05:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:06, 13 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTPLOT, better suited to wikia. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:30, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing sufficient third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 23:16, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.