Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magicthegathering.com (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Magic: The Gathering. (The redirect was a misclick.)  Sandstein   20:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Magicthegathering.com
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article topic is not covered by reliable, secondary, source (that is, also not in-passing mentions) in any degree sufficient to justify a standalone article. All of the sources in the present article are primary. All of the sources presented as possibly indicating notability in the previous AFD are weak or unreliable. A brief review also indicates a lack of the sources necessary to write this article.

A "redirect" result is not particularly objectionable (presumably to Magic: The Gathering), but given the previous AFD survival, a bold redirect might have been undone, so I'm skipping that step.

For reference, the pair of searches reviewed: and. Izno (talk) 21:55, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  22:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment I suspect a redirect is the right choice here. This is no longer in active use as a brand. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:55, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:55, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to either WotC or MtG articles. I agree with Power~enwiki, that this does not appear to be current branding for the product line. Jclemens (talk) 05:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.