Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnesium oil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Some of the sources found were questionable, but it is clear that there is no consensus to delete. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Magnesium oil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any information on this topic from reliable sources. All I can find are sites selling the product. I've tried searching the .edu top level domain and using Google scholar but didn't find anything relevant. T.C.Haliburtontalk nerdy to me 17:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (state)  @ 14:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep – Passes WP:GNG. Source examples include, , , , (partial preview). Furthermore, this source states that Magnesium oil is another name for Transdermal Magnesium. Source examples for Transdermal Magnesium include , , . N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and incorporate sources above. Piboy51 (talk) 16:52, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  01:14, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per NorthAmerica's sources. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 12:18, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * delete Yet more faith-based medicine. If editors insist of adding this stuff, it behoves them to at least source it. As it is, even with the sources listed above, they're still primary-sourced anecdote more than a credible peer-reviewed source. WP:MEDRS anyone? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.