Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnificentwords.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.Blnguyen | rant-line 06:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Magnificentwords.com
De-prodded by article's creator. Site itself is not yet listed on Google, two google hits - one anonymous comment on a blog calling it a 'new poll site,' which seems to have since been removed, and one forum post calling it 'the world's leading poll site' - poster has only three posts on the forum in question, all of which relate to Magnificentwords.com. -- Vary | Talk 14:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * delete spam frymaster 15:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Website with no Alexa rank. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

This is exactly the same discussion which occurred when alex tew created the million dollar home page. I would not agree in saying the site is prodded by the creator or else they would not make hundreds of thousands in advertising revenues. To verify this contact the pan european properties secretary (www.p-ep.com) who are the primary advertisers of the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Websiteinnovations (talk • contribs)
 * I didn't say that the site was 'prodded' by the creator, I said it was de-proded by the creator. That means that the person who started the article (you) removed the prod (or proposed deletion) tag.  It's wikijargon, and I'm sorry if the term confused you. -- Vary | Talk 19:02, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious spam and clearly untrue claims. Wikipedia does not provide free advertising for brand new sites (Domain registered 2 weeks ago). Fan1967 18:48, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Ofcourse wikipedia does not offer advertising for brand new free sites - but my intention is draw on new web innovations hence my user name. Please search recent archives of the herald tribune to find a complete article on this site - and once again these are the identical commetns found when alex tew created the million dollar homepage - and I would not gain anything out of promoting the site, i do not own it or else I would not be spending my time writing about I would be relaxing of the $100's of thousands. And once again please verify my claim of their income by contacting their primary andvertisers - pan european properties - www.p-ep.com (.co.uk). Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Websiteinnovations (talk • contribs) 22:11, June 22, 2006
 * There are many publications that go by variations on the name 'herald tribune'. If you have media coverage or any other evidence of notability that you think would allow the site to pass WP:WEB, please provide a link.   Thanks.


 * Please don't feel that anyone is accusing you of being the creator of the site, and even if you were, that wouldn't necessarily affect this discussion - we're trying to determine the notability of the site, per WP:WEB, not your motivations in creating the article. -- Vary | Talk 23:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I've re-worded my nom slightly, since it seems my original wording implied that the creator of the article was the owner of the site. Sorry! -- Vary | Talk 23:34, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:SPAM. --Coredesat 23:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

The miami herald does not publish the articles on the internet until a couple of weeks, additionally on the who is database owner info is given a mr. paul findlay, i suggest he should be contacted along side pan european properties and also in regard to alexa - not even alexa.com is mentioned in the alexa.com search! Kindest Regards and still the notability is significant despite it;s young age. Please search via msn, some more comments appear I found. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Websiteinnovations (talk • contribs) 23:41, 22 June 2006.


 * Delete as failing WP:WEB. Best of luck to the site owner in making the site a notable one, but it's not there yet. Good luck also to the article author in becoming familiar with Wikipedia's customs. --William Pietri 00:11, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep - the site is used by millions and gloally known, it might be simplisitc but utterly succesfull and I followed websiteinnovations advice by contactin magnificentwords lead advertiser and he/she is correct - they earn hundreds of thousands of dollars in advertising. - thanks jane aldeshot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.141.210.236 (talk • contribs) 14:35, June 25, 2006


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.