Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnomatics Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per consensus and since the only keep opinion is based on an incorrect premisse, as Alan Liefting points out. Fram (talk) 10:44, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Magnomatics Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 10:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Mentions in technical journals and the like don't prove notability at this time. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, weakly. Were this a notable business, it would not have called itself a world leader in the opening paragraph.  They make electric motors, and there's a fair amount of technical detail also in the article, but all revolves selling this business's product. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep (but needs rewriting by someone not from that company). Reason: Magnetic Continuously Variable Transmission This seems to be the only company that is currently developing this unique technology. It could be revolutionary (in hybrid vehicles) or just another commercially nonviable tech, but because they are the only ones, it makes them (barely) notable. --GlowBee (talk) 11:56, 26 February 2012 (UTC) (Retentionist)
 * Notability is not inherited. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.