Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnomax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Magnomax

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Hoax Skarebo (talk) 11:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related page because it is a part of the hoax:


 * Delete: smells like spam. Look at the external links section. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:44, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both as hoaxes. The chemistry described in Magnomax is completely inaccurate.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:58, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both—possible G3 speedy. Does seem to be a hoax. Both external links in the Magnomax article appear to involve nonexistent domain names, and googling for selected terms and names in the articles turns up nothing relevant. Deor (talk) 13:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Googling does turn up relevant information, albeit under the name Magnamax. However, it seems to be uncommon, except in pseudoscientific bracelets. Possibly the name has recurred under similar conditions. Article cannot stand as is without references. Listing of nonexistent refs (Wayback Machine confirms) indicates a hoax. Potatoswatter (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing any relevant information in a "Magnamax" search—in particular, nothing that relates to a material developed by anyone named Kerr. Deor (talk) 18:04, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.