Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnus Cedenblad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. However, if anyone wants this article to be userfied into their userspace, I am willing to do so upon request at my user talk page. Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Magnus Cedenblad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesnt seem to pass WP:NMMA. GladiusHellfire (talk) 03:58, 12 February 2013 (UTC) *Keep - Per Luchuslu. You can withdraw your nom if you want and there are not delete !votes. --LlamaAl (talk) 16:08, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - As he has a four-fight deal with the UFC. WP:COMMONSENSE says he will meet the three-fight minimum in the future. As there is a contract, it shouldn't fall under WP:CRYSTAL. Luchuslu (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment That is a valid point, but a fighter could still be cut from his contract. GladiusHellfire (talk) 06:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom and Gladius's comment IronKnuckle (talk) 07:03, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Admin note: The nominator has been CU confirmed as a sockpuppet of this account. - The Bushranger One ping only 14:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete He hasn't fought in almost a year. Assuming he gets 2 more top tier fights is WP:CRYSTALBALL because contracts get changed all the time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.126.132.231 (talk) 14:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom commments. --LlamaAl (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the previous delete comments. He doesn't meet WP:NMMA and assuming he will is WP:CRYSTALBALL.  No objection to article re-creation if/when he meets WP:NMMA.Mdtemp (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fighters are routinely cut before their contract term is up if they lose a fight. See it all the time and this is not a crystal ball to meet WP:NMMA. Mkdw talk 07:42, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * IMO to assume that he will be cut is clearly WP:CRYSTALBALL. He's currently under contract, so it can be logically presumed through WP:COMMONSENSE he will pass WP:NMMA. If he gets cut before his third top-tier fight, renominate him and vote delete. Luchuslu (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * You're misinterpreting what I said. I am pointing out that fighters (in general) are routinely cut pre-mature of his fight. You changed my meaning to say he will be cut which is completely different and a counter-point to your crystalball saying he will meet WP:NMMA. There is a very strong difference. My argument is simply pointing out that that crystball is in effect because the only known thing right now is he does not meet the guideline. Any arguments for keep are based out of crystal because the outcome is never a guarantee even under contract. Mkdw talk 20:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Admin note: The nominator of this article for deletion has been indefinitly blocked as a sockpuppet. - The Bushranger One ping only
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

*Weak Keep fails WP:NMMA but he was scheduled to fight in the UFC again before an injury so its unlikely that he would be cut from the UFC right away so keep the page for now if he gets cut before the three fight minimum renominate the page for deletion. Green Man 20 (talk) 18:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Green Man 20 has been confirmed as a sockpuppet of Entity of the Void. Papaursa (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Assuming he will eventually meet the standards looks like a crystal ball to me. I have no problems with the article being recreated when he meets the criteria.  With only one fight in the past 16 months, it looks like it may be awhile before he meets the criteria (which would require 2 more top tier fights).Mdtemp (talk) 20:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete With only one top tier fight he fails to meet WP:NMMA. The article can be recreated when he gets his third fight. Papaursa (talk) 23:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.