Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahāmada


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. No basis for deletion is stated and WP:SNOW (non-admin closure).  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 23:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Mahāmada

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Needs more Refs DWhiskaZ (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Article is not fully ready for Wiki Standards.

Refernces must be obtained from Library Books and Actual Photos from Vedas

Article still going through Edits and will take time to provide Refs to be upto Standards

Article is being investigated by University of Toronto (Scarborough Campus) and researchers will need more time to provide all information.

--DWhiskaZ (talk) 18:29, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Question: Is the nominator supporting deletion ? I ask because he created the article, and he and his apparent sock IP are arguing for the article on FTN and edit warring to prevent it from being redirected to Bhavishya Purana - as seems to be the consensus on the board. Abecedare (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment -- Sorry if apparent sock IP which perhaps forgot to log in according to Wiki did not offend or violate any terms.


 * Speedy keep None of those is a reason for deletion. If the article isn't "fully ready for Wiki standards", fix it up. There is no deadline for completion of the project; almost every article is currently under construction. I would highly recommend that you please familiarize yourself with the deletion policy first before listing another article for deletion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:14, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Wikipedia does not have deadlines.  We are never finished with our articles here.  Everything takes time to do, so the argument that 'it'll take time to find references' doesn't fly as an argument.  Our deletion policy should give you a better idea of what are valid reasons to put something up for deletion.  Primarily, we only delete something if it isn't notable or verifiable. Celarnor Talk to me  21:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment This article can be imporoved and will be (We have got intouch of the Books that mention Mahamad) and i find it useless to redirect to Bhavishya Purana because Mahamad is also mentioned in books RigVed, Atharvaveda, Kalki Avtar and Samaveda. If you ever see these books they are really thick and its going to take time to go through all them. Thats why we have an team going through the books. --DWhiskaZ (talk) 21:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.