Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Article subject passes WP:GNG and WP:ORG due to sources present. (non-admin closure) Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 09:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am usually lenient with educational institutions. But this one is a straight exception. No references/ notability, and is a catalog of a private teaching education in current form. Devopam (talk) 08:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 09:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 09:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 09:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. A medical college that operates two teaching hospitals should be a unanimous keep. A quick search indicates there are sufficient WP:RS for WP:V and WP:N, later (when I have time) I will come back and add them to the article if nobody else does. Jack N. Stock (talk) 12:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as a degree-awarding institution per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as meeting WP:GNG. Unlike the nominator, I am not usually lenient with educational institutions, but this one seems to have sufficient coverage including in major newspapers, as one would expect of a medical school. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please check the article is cleanuped and improved..Sangappadyamani (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, thanks to the revamped article in current shape now. Thanks to effort by . Devopam (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep there are plenty of reliable sources present which help the subject pass GNG. Pratyush (talk) 10:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.