Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahaguru (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  So Why  06:37, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Mahaguru (2007 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Found no coverage of this film in reliable sources. This film thus fails WP:NFILM, just like the 1985 film, which was also nominated for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep This film is a notable successful Bengali film of actor Mithun Chakraborty.Rajeshbieee (talk) 10:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 00:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Reliable sources are cited. The source is The Telegraph The Telegraph (Calcutta) passes WP:GNG Anoptimistix (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:33, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The one source suggested as supporting notability, a list of statistics in The Telegraph (Calcutta), clearly fails WP:GNG. It is not in-depth coverage of the film. It is merely a list of basic statistics for seven different films, and it says almost nothing about this film. The fact that some particular actor is in it means nothing, because notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. To establish notability, the topic must have "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", and "multiple sources are generally expected". This article clearly fails the test. —BarrelProof (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * comment Was not in the Relisted 3 Times category all week, for some reason. L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  02:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.