Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahamandaleshwar Paramhans Swami Maheshwarananda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. - Philippe 19:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Mahamandaleshwar Paramhans Swami Maheshwarananda

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Religious leader that is a non notable with only passing references in scant sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 00:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)</small
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 00:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 13:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Check the reference section again. He seems to be a noted person. Deserves a keep with need of further referencing. -- gp pande  «talk»  09:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There isn't a reference section for the article, it was a lack of references that led me to question this article. The statements made are unsourced. Also, are you suggesting that he is a notable author? I will add this discussion to the author deletion sorting page to try to get more comments. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Even though not all users approve of this, the Bibliography section lists a bunch of sources. For example, this article has examples of bibliography, but then again, it also has in-line cites. TALKIN   PIE EATER   REVIEW ME  17:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply After reviewing this bibliography, it seems that this is a list of books he wrote. As he wrote them, they are not helpful in establishing his notability. There needs to be neutral third party sources. Presently there are none. If you would like to help this article, please do add references to the article to back up any claims to notability. I have found none and believe the subject to be non notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 17:38, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.