Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahendra Kudiya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 07:03, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Mahendra Kudiya

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional article about a non-notable person. Persistent recreation and moves from draft to mainspace. The source in the article is not sufficient enough to notability Jamiebuba (talk) 06:23, 18 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism,  and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * CommentI think this page is a Promotional article about a non-notable person, only one single Article That too is not secondary Sources fail WP:RS And not falling into WP:GNG Criteria, move to Draft Lionfox0909 (talk) 18:37, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't meet the GNG: the best sources I could find are ones like and, both of which are clearly non-independent puff pieces. Draftification wouldn't be helpful here, in my view, since the main problem – non-notability – can't be resolved by editing and shows no sign of going away in the near future. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:17, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.