Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maher Baker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 23:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Maher Baker

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable promotional article deleted already on ar.wiki, who are more qualified than us to judge the sourcing. The sources are self-published or otherwise unreliable/unrelated to the subject. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, and all sources are fake (any one can create such links about himself) -- Alaa )..! 21:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - All the sources are unreliable.

Here's an explanation:

1. Cites a Google search, not reliable

2. WP:CITEIMDB

3. Page is just a collection of his books with no biographical information

4. Spam site for autobiographies

5. Citation only has one sentence.

6. Award with no information about Maher

7. Award with no information about Maher

8. Primary source written by the author

9. Citation only has one sentence

10. Page is just a collection of his books with no biographical information

11. Citation only has one sentence

12. Primary source written by the company itself

13. Primary source written by the company itself

14. Doesn't even mention Maher or any of his companies

15. Doesn't even mention Maher or any of his companies

So basically it is an unreliably sourced article, so I vote for deletion. Analog Horror, ( Speak ) 23:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
 * NO.4 "is self-published site that’s mainly used to provide cover for autobiographies and other such spam." We already put it on spam list on arwiki, and soon on enwiki -- Alaa )..! 00:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright, I added it to the list now, thanks for letting me know. Analog Horror, ( Speak ) 00:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unable to find anything to substantiate notability. GNG fail. Netherzone (talk) 22:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass our notability criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:REFBOMBed article that fails WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.