Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahesh dilemma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete per WP:SNOW by User:RegentsPark at 18:14, 1 July 2009

Mahesh dilemma

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was PRODded once as OR, and contested by an IP with no explanation. Another PROD was added later, and I was seconding the PROD when I saw the earlier one, so bringing here instead. This is at best a term paper, but is entirely original research that is lacking in context, but based on the name of the contributor, this article is about his thoughts on a choice between life and intellect! There are a couple of Ghits, but nothing relevant. Delete SpacemanSpiff (talk) 01:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 01:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 01:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I think Mahesh should take his dilemma somewhere else. Priyanath talk 01:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, far, far away from here. Gtadoc (talk) 02:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No dilemma as to the fate of this article: delete. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and per WP:MADEUP. The few Google hits I found are about different subjects. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 03:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and per common sense.--Talain (talk) 04:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. Salih  ( talk ) 06:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research and/or personal essay. J I P  | Talk 06:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Need to be improved instead of deletion - The question will be asked anytime sooner than we think, and building a good article, consensus, knowledge on this subject is important for humans. Talk —Preceding undated comment added 10:03, 30 June 2009 (UTC).
 * It's an interesting question but this is not the place to discuss it - see No Original Research. Wikipedia is not for building knowledge on a new subject - we only report what has been built elsewhere and can be verified from independent reliable sources.JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR. An early close would be justified for this obvious case. Abecedare (talk) 14:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as soon as possible. Quite an example of WP:NOR. --Junius49 (talk) 01:57, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per HOAX and MADEUP. Certainly this concept is not new as the life v/s intelligence debate has been on since the birth of Artificicial Intelligence in the 60s. Seems like a mashup of some documentaries I saw on Discovery. --Deepak D'Souza 06:03, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looking pretty snowy. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:31, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Will a passing admin look at the snow here and take some action? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.