Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahfuzul Haque


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Mahfuzul Haque

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is full of references from unreliable sources, The article fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG Arif Arif (talk) 00:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This user is indefinitely blocked from Bengali Wikipedia for abuse. See the comments of an administrator of Bengali Wikipedia about this user here. - Owais Al Qarni (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: Search by native name (মাহফুজুল হক) for more references here. Owais Al Qarni (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This user included this AFD in Bangladesh related discussion but Undid it. Owais Al Qarni (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Not sure what's going on with this nomination but the nom would have to explain which sources cited in the article are unreliable and why. On the face of it, the subject is certainly sufficiently prominent to pass WP:POLITICIAN and at least the English language sources cited in the article do check out. There are others as well, e.g. . If there are other issues with the article, someone more familiar with the subject matter at hand needs to explain what they are. Nsk92 (talk) 12:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The status of an editor on another project has no bearing on their AfD nominations here unless there is evidence the deletion nomination is part of a pattern of cross-wiki abuse, which no-one has established here and the point should be withdrawn. That said, the article subject appears to pass WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG, based on the sources in article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.