Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahima Bakshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹   13:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Mahima Bakshi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources can be found, fails WP:N and WP:BIO. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 14:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)


 * delete It is sad that a beautiful babe like Mahima is going to be deleted from Wikipedia, I could not find sources documenting her notablility.Terriblechristian (talk) 14:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


 * keep please google her name.. she's notable and her article are available on reliable sources...please check reference link Cpavlankar (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, The given references in article are not reliable sources. We need mention of her in mainstream newspapers like TOI, Hindustan Times, The Hindu, etc. Please see what is counted as reliable source at WP:IRS.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 07:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Although one or two sources are generally not enough to warrant a stand alone article, the Unique Times and FilmFare Magazine mentions look promising.  V e r s a c e 1 6 0 8 (Talk) 13:22, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough evidence of notability. Ch  an  de r  18:14, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article has enough sources, but it seems that these sources are not reliable. The creator or whosoever who has interest in this article should contribute something on the article, so that the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for biographies.  Kunal For  You ContribsTalk 16:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.