Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahjoub Omer Bashary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Mahjoub Omer Bashary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability  Jay  Jay What did I do? 01:30, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep this man good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.200.131.145 (talk) 09:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 17:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - while he might have been a good man, there is neither allegation nor proof that he was notable. We are not a website of good men. Bearian (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. Assuming (fairly safely) that the "President Abood" mentioned in the article was in fact Ibrahim Abboud, the first military ruler in Sudan after its independence, there is a plausible though weak claim for notability in the article (it would still depend on a clearer description of the subject's role). However, I can't even find any verification (excluding Wikipedia mirrors). Having said that, the period under discussion is fifty years or so ago, and Sudanese matters have rarely been discussed in any detail in American or British media - so there is a definite possibility of systemic bias, with relevant sources never having got online. But to keep this, we do need sources. PWilkinson (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources turn up allowing us to verify the information here. There's a possible claim of notability, but no means of checking it. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:46, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.