Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahmoudreza Hejazi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 22:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Mahmoudreza Hejazi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources that demonstrate the notability of the subject and in particular the subject appears to fail the notability guidelines for academics. The included references are either not reliable or do not provide substantive coverage. A contested Prod, so taken to AfD. Sparthorse (talk) 18:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As written, the article doesn't include anything that would lead me to believe that the subject is notable. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Almost no GS cites in highly cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:25, 27 October 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete No evidence that this meets WP:PROF. --Crusio (talk) 06:38, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. As a recent Ph.D. he is unlikely to pass WP:PROF and the citation record confirms this assessment. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per David Eppstein and others. That said, though, I think the usual caveats apply here - he is a new PhD, as noted, so it's possible that future research or publications may indicate notability. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:47, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

A new reference (Mahmoud's biography in Marquis Who's Who) has been added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.57.70 (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Marquis Who's Who uses information supplied by the subjects themselves and is not independent. In addition, Marquis is more or less a vanity press outfit. --Crusio (talk) 06:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.