Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahnoor Baloch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Mahnoor Baloch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unnotable actress. Unreferenced biography of a living person. bender235 (talk) 10:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash; There is some credibility to the article's assertions of notability, being that she is in fact a moderately well known model and actress in Pakistan. A Google search yields several relevant results, and she has a starring role in a Pakistani television series that has its own article on Wikipedia, but even that one barely survived AfD back in 2008. This is a borderline case, and I prefer to err on the side of caution when it comes to barely notable living people.  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 11:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Several results returned on Google. There is evidence that the actress has starred in several television serials and films. The article could do with improvement although that's no reason to call the subject unnotable. Mar4d (talk) 09:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: The person is notable enough and citations can be found for enough content for a separate article. The google search gives 398,000 results (mostly about this person including many news results) and then we have books   .  --lTopGunl (talk) 01:15, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Sources have been offered. Relisting for additional discussion


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per the sources. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 07:15, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.