Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahsa Saeidi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Mahsa Saeidi

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This is a clear case of someone notable for one event. Saeidi is notable only for her appearance on The Apprentice, and the aftermath of her firing from the show. My initial prod was deleted with the justification that she was legal correspondent for Fox News - however the source given for that statement in the article is simply a guest interview about The Apprentice and her firing - not her acting as a correspondent, or as Fox staff. It makes no indication that she is joining Fox in the interview.

That said, even if she is now a legal correspondent, I think that she would have to also become notable as a correspondent in order for her to pass the hurdle of WP:BLP1E - otherwise isn't it simply a case of her riding out the popularity gained from a reality TV appearance? Addionne (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Smerge to The Apprentice (U.S. season 10). There's no coverage about her other than the flap over the sexism accusation from Season 10 of The Apprentice.  A selective merge of information would be appropriate as the Season 10 article has no information about this little tidbit. -- Whpq (talk) 15:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per reasons given in nomination (notable for one event). - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.