Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mai Sakurajima


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Mai Sakurajima

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails the general notability guideline. Only one source referenced. Aasim 16:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:58, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No reception/review of the character and no notability. lullabying (talk) 17:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can go away because of the missing sources, besides, I don't think you need the article. (no notability) TheImaCow (talk) 17:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Independent notability for any character needs to be established to justify a separate article. For future reference,, see Naruto Uzumaki and how that article is laid out, specifically how most of that article (or any featured article about a character) mostly contains real-world information about the character's creation, and their reception.-- 十八 22:27, 30 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Character is not notable at all. No significant, non-primary, non-trivial mentions for the subject. Kori  ( @ ) 03:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.