Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maiden of Ludmir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep - CrazyRussian talk/email 12:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Maiden of Ludmir
This page has almost no content, is not notable, and does not cite any sources. --רח"ק
 * Delete --רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 20:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I rescind my delete vote. --רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 04:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.  - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Never heard of her. Hoax? - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a hoax, she existed and this would make a fascinating entry, if someone has the time to go through all that the web has on her. She might even be in the 1911 EB, if there's a link to it. Yossiea 20:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per the book on her (added to the article). Good stub. Suggest withdrawal. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps someone can translate from he:WP he:הבתולה מלודמיר - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is now adequately sourced, clearly notable, no reason to delete.--Shirahadasha 23:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * delete it is close to a copyvio from the book discription at amazon which mostly bothers me because it show that the author of the article didn't read the book! There is no context given on how she was accepted by mainstream movements or who she really way. It is clear from the book summary that she was far from accepted, but it is impossible to know to what extent just from a book summary. The article implies that she was well accept but I doubt very much that this is true. This is the type of thing that would remain a stub for years with no one ever bothering to accutally read the book.  Unless someone is willing to put in the effort to expand this I think that keeping a stub is harmful and misleading. Jon513 02:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * strong keep she did exist and was is an important historical figure in chassidic judaism.JJ211219 17:47, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Stong keep- she is quite notable. There have been books, plays, and stories about her. She realy did exist. --Jayrav 17:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep because she is, if anything at the least, a figure of Jewish literature. Wikify what is in it so far. Those above who claim that "they have never heard of her" need to be more careful. A simple Google search for Maiden of Ludmir yields many important sources, articles, and material to help any editors who wish to improve this article. IZAK 08:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep She is notable, unusual, the stub could easily be expanded, and its existence helps counter (in a small way) Wikipedia's systemic bias.--Sepa 10:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. --Cúchullain t/ c 02:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.