Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maids Moreton Church of England School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was well, merge seems to be a reasonable compromise. Looks like that's already been done, so redirect. JYolkowski // talk 00:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Maids Moreton Church of England School


Non notable primary school with only 45 pupils Delete-- Jaranda wat's sup 00:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - no assertion of notability. MER-C 03:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Only 45 pupils? Sounds really non-notable to me.  Ultra-Loser [ T  ] [  C  ]  04:02, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to Maids Moreton. What little relevant information that exists should be copied over to the locality article and the existing article changed to a redirect. There is no valid reason to delete this without a merge/redirect. Alansohn 06:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy A7, organization with no assertion of notability. Seraphimblade 06:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect The school has been serving the community since 1854. Scribble Monkey 09:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * On reflection merge/redirect would be more appropriate. Scribble Monkey 15:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Maids Moreton. Catchpole 13:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Alansohn, yet more schoolcruft, but may be of local interest, therefore a redirect per WP:LOCAL would be appropriate. Also, redirects may encourage the school-stub-spammers to focus their time and energy on more useful articles.  Xtifr tälk 14:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Maids Moreton. Arctic-Editor 20:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge/Redirect The fact that that has only 45 pupils does not make it non-notable. Albatross2147 22:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Any reason to keep it? JoshuaZ 02:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm inclined to disagree, 45 is ridiculous. Rever e ndG 22:24, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. The seeming lack of expansion potential makes this an obvious merge candidate. That avenue should have been explored prior to this AfD. --JJay 23:06, 24 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - YAschoolcruftarticle. Pete Fenelon 01:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * weak Merge bordering on Delete The probability that this school has something notable about it that we are unable to uncover from a web search (given that it has been around for 150 years) is not low. It therefore has a high likelyhood of having something notable about it that would justify an article in the future. In the meantime, there is nothing notabel about this school and the content should therefore be merged. JoshuaZ 02:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested above. bbx 09:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect per above. Another nn school. Eusebeus 11:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * merge and redirect to the village article is a good decision here Yuckfoo 21:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Eusebeus. --Kuzaar-T-C- 15:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to village article.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 09:32, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.