Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maidstone United F.C. season 2008-2009


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete the two listed by the nominator. The others did not have an AfD tag on them, and will need to be nominated separately. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:30, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Maidstone United F.C. season 2008-2009

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Precedent here and here has established that football clubs which play below the professional leagues do not merit articles on individual seasons unless the club achieved something truly remarkable. Obviously by definition the club has achieved nothing remarkable in a season which has not yet started. For the same reason I am also nominating Maidstone United F.C. season 2007-2008, in which the club also achieved nothing especially remarkable ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both I don't believe teams outside fully professional leagues deserve season by season articles. I would also suggest deleting Eastbourne Borough F.C. season 2007-08 and Eastbourne Borough F.C. season 2008-09 for exactly the same reason. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  20:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all four per above. Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 22:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Undeserving of season by season articles barring something particularly exciting, which happened in none of these cases.  Vickser (talk) 22:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. GiantSnowman 01:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete both Maidstone United and Eastbourne season 2007-08, keep Eastbourne 2008-09, I thought the criteria for seasons articles were for teams in a national league making Conference National teams seasons valid. Therefore this seasons article for Eastbourne meets notability. --Jimbo[online] 09:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If that's the case then I'll change my vote to match yours. Could you provide a link to this policy/guideline/discussion? Dan1980 (talk ♦ stalk) 13:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I've had a look but can't find anything to support my claims. I guess the following should be included in this AfD too. --Jimbo[online] 15:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Aldershot Town F.C. season 2007-08
 * Woking F.C. season 2007-08
 * York City F.C. season 2006-07
 * York City F.C. season 2007-08
 * Comment Surely Aldershot returning to the Football League is worthy enough? Bettia   (rawr CRUSH!)  11:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Maidstone United F.C. season 2008-2009. None of the others are currently AFDs. We should discuss each separately - there may be merit to one of them. Nfitz (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Maidstone United F.C. season 2007-2008 is also an AfD, as I nominated the two articles together...... ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all, they're all regarding teams who did not play in a fully professional league at the time. --Angelo (talk) 22:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd have to agree with deleting the non-league teams. However those Conference teams are well publicized and those York articles have really good citation, so I don't think they should be deleted. Govvy (talk) 19:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.