Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mail2tor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 02:58, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Mail2tor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not finding any reliable sources. (Fails GNG / NWEB). &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  18:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'm adding more reliable citations. Give me time, User:Rhododendrites Alphaslucas talk  09:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC) Ok, User:Rhododendrites I've added some reliable sources.  Alphaslucas talk  10:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * See WP:RS (and possibly WP:HEYMANN). Widefox ; talk 10:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete 0 WP:RS fails WP:GNG (I'm not counting WP:UGC and passing mentions as significant coverage). Widefox ; talk 11:56, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Also found zero reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. None of the currently cited sources (after the above comments said they were added) met what I'd consider "reliable" (see WP:RS). Agyle (talk) 22:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.