Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailamp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Yunshui 雲 水 12:25, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Mailamp

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failed to discover how this product has passed our notability guidelines. Even with the New York Times article, that seems to be a mere mention, I think it fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Thanks for your input, everyone. SarahStierch (talk) 19:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  20:25, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I've been through the web archives of the major computer magazines and tech sites, as well as the usual resource checks, and I struck out finding anything. I did find the mention in the Ny Times, but it is just a simple mention and doesn't help the page pass the WP:GNG/WP:CORP threshold. EBstrunk18 (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete An obscure voice messaging add on for outlook in 2003 is not notable. It was mentioned in one article in the New York Times. I don't even think it exists anymore. 123chess456 (talk) 03:48, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I'm not finding sufficient evidence for this to meet WP:GNG or WP:NSOFT.  Gongshow   talk  01:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.