Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailboxing iOS game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. consensus seems to be there is not yet any evidence for notability  DGG ( talk ) 02:52, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Mailboxing iOS game

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No indication that this game meets the general notability guideline. I found a few user-submitted reviews and copies of a news release by the game's creator but there seems to be very little in-depth coverage by third-party reliable sources. Pichpich (talk) 13:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The game is still a new game and it hasn't received as much attention as "Angry Birds" however each day the number of media and other source of coverage is growing. So this is article will still grow to become richer with references. 5:12, 4 June (GMT +2) Austris
 * But Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and therefore only contains articles about topics that have received coverage sufficient to build a well sourced article. If this game receives the kind of attention you're hoping for, this article can be recreated down the road. Pichpich (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Just added big reliable source as it was the first game to enter the iOS market from Latvia and was featured in Latvian biggest Business web media sites, it delivers more value to it's origin story. Just to get things clear, then I would like to know how manny sources I have to submit in the article so it wouldn't be considered as an article for deletion. And how reliable the source have to be, like the Db.lv is a site with at least 250k daily visitors. 5:29, 4 June (GMT +2) Austris


 * Delete. Being the "first iOS game from Latvia" has no bearing on notability. Basically just a long advertisement; article is sailing perilously close to the G11 wind as it is. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 14:54, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I have to say that this G11 also says: ". Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." This article is not promotional, the material is written in natural 3d person view and delivers normal natural feedback about the "Game" as the wikipedia it self suggests, it delivers articles about games, movies e.c this is behind these categories and mustn't be confused or abused about promotional materials. 5:29, 4 June (GMT +2) Austris
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON if ever. Wikipedia is not for things that will one day be notable but things that have been notable.  Dismas |(talk) 22:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The article has been updated with reliable source, as the Wikipedia rule book says: "require that the topic being considered be itself verifiable in independent secondary reliable sources." Therefor it mustn't not be subjected to the form as TOOSOON article. From Latvian point of view this is a big achievement and notable article, because the game has been up in the top of Latvian App store, had a lot of media coverage e.c. To question the reliability to this article is to insult the status of Latvian achievements and it's considerable nationality suppression. 10.45 Am, 5 June 2012 (GMT +2) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austrisu (talk • contribs) 07:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Going through the revisions, there were links in the eternal link sections to reviews in Latvian and Polish, but both of these amounted to here's a new app and do not serve to give this particular app notability nor do they seem to support the claim that it's the first iOS game from Latvia. Eastshire (talk) 13:22, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.