Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maine bound adventure center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  speedy deleted (G11) Dudel250 ChatPROD Log CSD Logs 10:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Maine bound adventure center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Topic isn't notable enough for an encyclopedia article, article is more of an advertisement, and there isn't enough encyclopedic material to warrant a merge beyond perhaps a sentence or two. ElKevbo (talk) 04:07, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Outside of University of Maine and social media, there are no reliable sources about the center.  Only could find ad like and brief mentions.  If anything, copy a few sentences into the main University of Maine pages. Bgwhite (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable unreferenced article with no reliable sources found. Minimal content can be recreated in a new section at University of Maine. Philg88 ♦talk 05:28, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Part of the information is already found on University of Maine. Most of the information reads like an advertisement. It looks like the UofM page could maybe use a section such as "Recreation" or maybe "Student life" where this would fit in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paisarepa (talk • contribs) 06:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions.  Philg88 ♦talk 05:21, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Per WP:SNOWBALL And Failing WP:GNG Dudel250 ChatPROD Log CSD Logs 07:44, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam. I've tagged it as a speedy and started the merger discussion on the UoM talk page. There is merit to having a small subsection about student life and including a few sentences about the group, but by large the page is so spammy that there's not a lot worth saving. The opening paragraph wasn't so bad, so I put that in the discussion section at Talk:University_of_Maine. I don't even really think that there needs to be a merger proposal so much as a brainstorming session on trying to find what can be put in the section other than this group, as UoM is a huge college and has more going on that should be included. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:50, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I've speedied it. Even if you were going to redirect, you wouldn't do it from this article title. Deb (talk) 10:52, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.