Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mainpac


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Mainpac

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article; trivial or promotional references; no evidence of notability  DGG ( talk ) 01:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: The references in the article are routine press announcements and searches are turning up more of the same. An asset management firm going about its business, but no evidence of notability. AllyD (talk) 08:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:CORP. no indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 23:41, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete spammy, no real indication of notability. Nick-D (talk) 07:29, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.