Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majha Naav Shivaji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:17, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Majha Naav Shivaji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article lacks proper references and my own searches were futile. As the release is predicted by article author for September 2016, and we currently lack enough independent sources to meet WP:NFF, my opinion is that as an article, this topic is simply TOO SOON. It can be reconsidered if or when adequate sourcing (even non-English) comes forward.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:43, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:40, 24 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now as there's still not the assured substance for a convincing article. SwisterTwister   talk  20:35, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 01:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * using WP:INDAFD: माझ नाव शिवाजी Majha Naav Shivaji Pranita Pawar Chakraborty Siyaa Patil Aditi Sarangdhar
 * alts:
 * Devanagari:
 * filmmaker:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per NFF as the film has not yet been released and the production itself is not notable under GNG. Rebb  ing  06:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.