Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majithia Sirdars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Majithia Sirdars

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is same as Articles for deletion/The Majithia Family that was deleted after being created more than once. Still no references found about the "Family". Notability of individuals may not pass on to the family. ChunnuBhai (talk) 08:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC) ping User:Graeme Bartlett User:SpacemanSpiff User:Onel5969 — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChunnuBhai (talk • contribs) 08:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Whilst the article needs improvement, a quick Google book search identified that the Majithia Sirdars (a title inherited from generation to generation) were powerful in the area at some point. --Soman (talk) 10:00, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  12:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This article does need some improvement, but the sirdars were an important and notable group in the area in the past — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sz643 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 22 March 2016‎ (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep -- If truthful, the family is certainly notable. The article certainly needs  a lot of referencing and improvement, but that implies tagging it,not deleting it.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.