Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major League Roller Hockey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. General consensus to keep due to the presence of reliable sources. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Major League Roller Hockey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep One of the top organizations in the sport of roller hockey. Clearly notable. -DJSasso (talk) 16:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I should also note that it wasn't created by user who created a swath of articles. Nom has been putting that in all his listings dispite the fact that many of them have not been. Plenty of sources on highbeam and google. -DJSasso (talk) 16:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Lack notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Coverage apparent at GNews, HighBeam confirms the notability of this organization, although the article could stand some heavy editing and clearer sourcing.--Arxiloxos (talk) 21:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * That argument seems to be WP:MUSTBESOURCES. If there are sources, provide them here. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions/Your Page) 01:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Not there "must be" sources, there are sources. Just click the findsources links above for HighBeam and GNews and there they are.  I can contemplate reducing the number of articles relating to this league by judicious mergers and deletions, but I don't see how we could reasonably conclude that this, the main article about the league, should be deleted.--Arxiloxos (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:GNG. GauchoDude (talk) 21:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.