Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Male pageants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 17:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Major Male pageants

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks like advertising. No independent sources conform WP:RS. Content fork of List of beauty contests. Created by an editor now blocked due to advertising. The Banner talk 22:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

•Delete where are the sources that cover these three businesses together as a topic? The use of WP:COLOR is an accessibility problem too. Legacypac (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - I thought at first this was about an event called Major Male. Seems to be pretty much WP:OR made by someone trying to make a judgement call as to which pageants should be considered notable. The individual pageants seem to be notable, but I am not seeing that they, as a group, make up a significant enough trio to justify their being lumped together like this. Mabalu (talk) 20:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete' Article not notable. No reliable sources covering the major male pageants unlike the female counterpart.--Richie Campbell (talk) 00:58, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.