Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Mano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Major Mano

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Tamil Tiger, article devoid of biographical detail; cursory passing mentions of pseudo-position do not add up to notability meriting separate article. THF (talk) 18:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nominator has said everything that needs to be said. Politizer talk / contribs 19:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems to be notable as he was a key player in: Long Range Reconnaissance Patrol operations and is also mentioned in: |The Sunday Times PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Extra Comment - also mentioned in The Nation (Thailand) on June 14, 2005, Tuesday PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: He was actually killed by the LRRP, not a key player in it. I'm not sure if getting killed by a particular military organization makes you notable.  C h a m a l  talk 10:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * keep, or possibly merge - 'Devoid of biographical detail' is not a reason for deletion. He does hold a position from what I can see: Even a quick Google search shows up notability. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * comment. if you search wioth -wikipedia, your hits get a lot less.Jasy jatere (talk) 15:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - This article has links from Tamil Tigers wikipedia page and shouldn't be deleted. Person mentioned in this article was a senior Tamil Tiger person. Please do not delete until agreed by Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sri Lanka Reconciliation members. Refer WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sri Lanka. -Iross1000 (talk) 00:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC).


 * Keep - "I am too lazy to look something up" isnt a valid reason for deletion.Pectoretalk 22:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Again, I've looked it up. The passing mentions in the press does not add up to notability, which is an objective Wikipedia standard. Please stop your personal attacks. THF (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I have made no personal attacks, but I did summarize your rationale for deletion in a somewhat blunt manner.Pectoretalk 02:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.