Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Matt Mason USA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 01:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Major Matt Mason USA

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Doesn't meet Notability (music). Neither the page nor my Google searches bring up multiple, non-trivial published works - just a few listings, reviews, mentions of releases and websites directly related to the subject. Billboard.com says he's never charted. Whouk (talk) 12:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete fails basic notability requirements.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – I've added multiple sources just now. The subject meets WP:MUSIC criterion #1, or the general notability guideline, with coverage in such varied publications as Allmusic (a biography and a review), the Coventry Evening Telegraph, the South Bend Tribune, the Birmingham Post, the Evening Times, and the Evening Chronicle. The sources suggest he is a prominent figure in the anti-folk music genre. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep per sources of excellent quality provided by Paul Erik. And more sources are available, such as reviews in Rockfeedback and musicOMH . I don't think the subject's notability is now still questionable. Cavarrone (talk) 05:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The above sources demonstrate that the subject passes WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow  Talk 21:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.