Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Nazmul Huq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Major Nazmul Huq

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only source I could find for this person was the link provided and I question it's neutrality. Regardless of that. There is insufficient information and a lack of sources to establish notability for this person. (I've tagged the image on the Commons as a copyvio from the same site) Mgm|(talk) 11:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - I agree several further sources are required, however he would match notability criteria, as a reasonably senior commander in the conflict if this source could be backed up. Might be worth leaving this article for the moment to give an opportunity for expansion and proper sourcing. Kurtk60 (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you have any evidence such sources exist? - Mgm|(talk) 11:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Mgm. I have been able to find one other source so far. Although it does not provide a huge amount of detail. I agree these two sources are probably too biased to provide an impartial bio, but they do suggest he did exist and was a sector commander in the war? Kurtk60 (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Comment. Google Books finds some seemingly reliable sources confirming the subject's position, and the manner of his death, but it only displays short snippets so it would need someone to check these out in a library to see if there is substantial coverage. For a general verified to hold a particular command in a war I would be willing to take it on trust that substantial coverage would exist in reliable sources, but in general (no pun intended) a major wouldn't attract this sort of coverage without some extraordinary achievement. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.