Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Major Saab


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep and close as moot. The current page is not the nominated page, and is about a distributed movie that makes a fair case for existence and notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Major Saab

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article may represent fiction that is out of context, a hoax, an attack page, vandalism, something made up one day, or a stream of consciousness. Whatever it is, it ought to be deleted. Richard Cavell (talk) 11:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - nonsense. Springnuts (talk) 11:21, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete G1, A1, A7: take your pick. The title isn't mentioned in the article; for that matter, I cannot figure out where it could be mentioned in the article. Mangoe (talk) 11:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD G12. 100% copyvio from IMDb. So tagged. • Gene93k (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Striking vote since this AfD is now about a different article than the one that was speedily deleted. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Article appears to have been deleted and now recreated - it is about a film. Springnuts (talk) 12:42, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy deletion as repost and copyvio requested. This AfD noted on talk page. Springnuts (talk) 12:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G12) as a copyvio. MuZemike  ( talk ) 13:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted per G12 and then re-created before the AfD closed. The new article appears to be clean but with notability not established. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (G12) as a copyvio. MuZemike  ( talk ) 13:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The article was deleted per G12 and then re-created before the AfD closed. The new article appears to be clean but with notability not established. • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment and question. The article was re-created after speedy. The new stub article appears to fix the main problems cited in the nomination and comments above. Since WP:NFILM is a separate issue, is a procedural close in order? This is unusual. • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd be for it. MuZemike  ( talk ) 14:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems marginally notable. Mangoe (talk) 16:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Major Saab is a not a hoax, not an attack page, not vandalism, and not something made up one day. It was a moderately successful 1978 1998 Amitabh Bachchan starrer movie. I have added few references. Salih  ( talk ) 16:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - it is a 1998 movie and of the firstfilms marking Amitabh's re-entry into films. --Gurubrahma (talk) 16:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gurubrahma =Nichalp   «Talk»=  17:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.